ZFS powered NAS, ultimate alternative to Drobo + Droboshare [Complete Guide]

I apologize to everyone for the looooonnnggg wait for this post. I have swapped out a few hardware components as well as OS for this NAS build. It wasn’t all pretty… and at times it felt frustrating… However, my NAS box and I have lived to tell the story.
In this post I will walk you through each step of the building process, so you won’t make the same mistakes I did. I have written two other posts detailing the thought-process on some of the choices, but for your convenience I’ll sum everything up in this one post.

The Goal
The story here is simple – we are building a DIY storage appliance that is not only FASTER but CHEAPER than the Drobo. I have owned a 2nd generation Drobo for about 8 months. For the most part, it did its job. However, all the weakness of the device surfaced when I dug into the world of Network Attached Storage or simply NAS. I have written about my attempts to put the Drobo on my LAN …   http://frankleng.me/2010/02/11/droboshare-alternatives-tonidoplug-gigabit-switch/ I did not want to spend another $200 for the Droboshare! That setup worked for the most part, but performance was not even close to production-worthy.
I mean try to live with a 4TB NAS that transferred at 3-5MB/s… which is actually on par with Droboshare’s throughput… need I say more?

What I needed was:

  1. Energy efficient, lower powered machine. (It’s a NAS after all, not a media center)
  2. Able to let me swap a drive when it fails, and not lose data.
  3. Able to expand, swapped out the smallest drive and replace with a larger drive.
  4. Costs a lot less than $350USD. (that’s the price of the Drobo, not including drives)
  5. Easily manageable, settings can be tweaked and system status can be monitored.
  6. Speed, Speed, Speed. Must be able to sustain Gigabit throughput, even for larger files.

The Facts
Most BYOD (Bring Your Own Drives) storage devices on the market today do NOT offer the features that the Drobo does. The Drobo was never designed as a NAS, but rather a DAS (Directly Attached Storage), and it did that job fairly well. So if you are an average user who favour ease-of-use than anything else… then read no more… you are better off with the Drobo. However, if you are like me and you want that blazing fast performance for the smallest price tag… you have found the right place. =)

NAS devices are computers too. The basic rules do apply – the faster the chipset the faster the throughput; the more RAM the better, etc.

Lastly, and most importantly NAS devices’ throughput depend largely on caching and the CPU’s ability to translate between different storage and communication protocols.

Intel D510MO

Intel D510MO

The Hardware

CPU
It is really quite difficult to find a blazing fast computer by today’s standard without killing your electricity bill. Most high end processors run 100W + and even lower end chips easily go over 40W (That’s almost the same as the Drobo’s power consumption with 4 drives inserted… so it’s quite a lot for a single chip!) Thankfully, Intel created the Atom series of processors. Originally made for netbooks and mobile devices, the Atom series chips are Intel’s smallest and greenest – consume only about 10W. You can buy Atom from most local computer stores, but note that they are bundled with a motherboard and not sold separately.

I picked the latest generation, and the fastest Dual-Core Atom chip -D510 @ 1.66GHZ. This chip gives the equivalent performance of a Single-Core Celeron running at 900-1000MHZ but uses 1/4 of the power, TDP rated at 13W. Because the chip is so new, very few motherboard manufacturers have them shipped to stores. I grabbed the Intel D510MO motherboard bundle for $80 CAD.(It was the cheapest option I found, and had the same features as the more expensive ASUS and Supermicro boards).

RAM
The D510MO takes DDR2 memory, and  I happened to have two 1GB sticks. Obviously the more the better, DDR2 RAM sticks are super cheap nowadays and you don’t need the fancy ones. 2GB RAM – $30

Add-ons

Modded PCI SATA Controller

Modded PCI SATA Controller

I want to talk about add-on cards because you will need one for this build. Like most Mini-ITX boards, the D510MO only has 2 onboard SATA ports and it’s not enough to have a more robust ZFS setup. Therefore, I searched online and bought a PCI-X/PCI SATA II controller card and gave me two more internal SATA ports. Later, I modded one of the the eSATA ports to SATA by replacing the connector head. The card was the SYBA SD-SATA2-2E2I – $36. There is a 4 SATA port version of the card, but I wasn’t able to find one at the store. I also liked the idea of having an eSATA port.

CHENBRO ES34069

CHENBRO ES34069

Case
I went through 2 cases for this build. I originally bought the Chenbro ES34069 because it had 4 swappable drive bays. However, the proprietary power supply, the lack of space in the case and noise from the case fans(fans were not user replaceable as far as I could tell) eventually made me return the purchase.

The case requirement here is simple, find a small case (mATX or mini-ITX) that has 4 drive bays. Do note that besides the Chenbro case, there really isn’t an alternative that has swappable bays. So go spend the $200 and buy it if you want ease of access. The case I ended up using was the Antec NSK-2480 – $100. It has plenty of space for the two 5.25′ and 3.25′ bays and a 380W standard power supply. It has the best cooling arrangement I have ever seen in a media center case. Head over to SilentPcReview for some professional opinions.

Antec NSK2480

Antec NSK2480

I also considered the NSK 1380 case, but spacing arrangement inside the case was nowhere near what the NSK 2480 had. However, the first does have much smaller dimensions.

Antec NSK1380

Antec NSK1380

Drives
First of all, you will need a set of drives to store data and one other drive to host the OS. I have purchased 4 WD Green 2TB 5400rpm drives because they are quiet, efficient and more than fast enough for a NAS. However, do know that you will need at least 3 drives to take full advantage of ZFS. Also, the current version of ZFS does not allow you to add physical drives to an existing ZFS pool. Although you will be able to REPLACE one of the four drives for a bigger one, adding a 5th drive without rebuilding is not possible at the moment. This means if you started out with 4 drives, you will always have 4 unless you recreate your logic pool and lose all the data in the process.

I guess this is the only spot where Drobo may have an edge over our ZFS build. You can add more drives into the Drobo at any time until the slots are full. I believe Drobo accomplishes this by pre-populating its storage pool with virtual devices, and a virtual total size. That way, any new drive can just slide into these pre-made virtual slots without affecting the storage pool as a whole. Lastly, the ZFS development team has plans to resolve this limitation in the near future. So let’s stay tuned.

For the OS drive I decided to use USB sticks. They are much cheaper and much more energy efficient than having another disk spinning at 5400rpm to keep the system running. I used a USB port expansion cable to make use the connector on the motherboard and keep the sticks inside the case. Check out the picture and you’ll know what I mean. =p

Adapter with dual USB sticks

Accessories
The D510MO board does not have an IDE port to hook up a CD-ROM drive. It does support booting from USB. However, most OSes do not offer a .usb image for install. Therefore, I purchased an IDE to USB adapter so I could boot from my DVD drive. My IDE to SATA adapter was not recognized by BIOS for some reason… so please be aware if you are thinking about getting one of these things. It’s safer to get a SATA optical drive instead. I see them on sale now for under $20. Anyway, since FreeNAS supports USB images, there was no need for any additional accessories. (Note: Other OSes mentioned above will require a optical drive to install.)

Total cost: $246 (shipping included, taxes not included)

Next up… the software.  Turn the page.  =p

Popularity: 59% [?]

  • http://amaras-tech.co.uk/ munkymorgy

    Thank you for the interesting article. I have have been thinking about the Drobo FS vs Linux based NAS for a while, sounds like FreeNAS may be a winner.

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    thanx for dropping by. not sure exactly what hardware are inside the DroboFS but Engadget mentioned that it has a dual-core CPU, more RAM than the original Drobo and a revised Linux kernel. so I'd say it's not too much different than what I've got. =p
    but for $699 (empty DroboFS) the DIY setup costs 1/3 of that.

  • H3ctor

    can i add drives with different size to the array ?

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    you sure can. its just like a drobo.

  • H3ctor

    Thanks for your reply.
    Will it be like raid 1 or 5 ?

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    it's like Raid 5, but much more improved. ex. no more RAID 5 write hole

  • H3ctor

    Thanks alot , Great guide !

  • http://www.cdwalletprinting.com/ CD Storage Binder

    Seems a pretty good device :)

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    runs really well. been on ever since it was completed and never had to reboot once and never had any problems.

    It's also super quiet! no more crazy fan noise from the Drobo. I keep the box in my bedroom and I don't ever notice it. =p

  • H3ctor

    Another question that is on my mind , if the main HHD (the one that holds the freenas) , can i move an existing array to another machine or freenas installation ?

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    you mean if the OS drive fails?
    After your freeNAS is all configured. go to system backup it'll save everything into a XML file. you can simply import it into another freeNAS installation. takes seconds.

    also I use a USB stick as OS drive. It's much much more energy efficient than a HDD, and it's more reliable.
    The USB edition of FreeNAS only writes to the USB stick when the system is shutting down or saving changes. so the lifetime of the stick is preserved.

  • H3ctor

    thanks a lot again , you are very helpful :)

  • http://twitter.com/hofo Howard Fore

    Hey, I looked for the software followup post but didn't see it. What OS are you running on this box?

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    Hi Howard, it's on the 2nd page. http://frankleng.me/2010/05/01/zfs-powered-nas-

    I'm going to test again with Nexenta soon, and see how it performs against the FreeNAS build.

  • Mihai

    Hello Frank,

    I also have a wild comment to try out.
    As a Sys Admin BSD/Linux/Solaris, I find this solution very interesting.

    The only concern or wish I have for home use is for a case similar to those used by Thecus for example or by Drobo.
    The one you chose at the end from Antek, can it be placed vertically or provide hot-swappable bays ?
    If so, do you know of a slick alternative and by this I mean:
    1. cool design
    2. small size
    3. vertical position
    4. hot swappable bays
    5. low-noise (I also want to sleep in the same room :) )

    Can you advise here with an alternative ?

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    Hi Mihai. The Chenbro case I mentioned in the post will suit your needs a bit better. but it is a pricey case, and its exhaust fan was a bit loud. so I decided to return it.
    The Antek case cannot be placed vertically because there is no rubber foot to stand it up, and it's not very stable vertically either. I have tried it.

    Another interesting solution is go for the Intel Entry Storage machine. -http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/nas/nas-reviews/30482-intel-entry-storage-system-ss4200e-review

    I think manufactures are using the term “hot-swap” very losely these days, as opposed to calling them “cold-swap”. I guess SATA by nature is hot-swappable and ZFS will still run if you unplug a drive while the system is live. Personally. I don't think it's a particular safe practice to put in a drive like you do with the Drobo. For a home setup, I would just power off and replace the drive as I usually do, aka cold swap. =)

    hope that helps!

  • Mihai

    Hello Frank,

    Thanks for the quick answer.
    I took a look at the Intel storage solution, but I still want ZFS and my own homemade, geeky setup, not something prebuilt :)
    Do you have any other recommendation similar to the Chenbro case ? (but with fan control and a power supply that can be easily replaced in case of a failure ?)

    Also, for the mainboard what would you suggest in case I'd want to be able to connect both a max. of 4 sata hdds and 2 SSDs (I was thinking at having one for ZIL and one for ARC).

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    the only case I can think of off the top of my head is a barebone 1U or 2U rack with swappable bays. obviously those don't come cheap.
    I also thought about going with a tower case and just buy 5.25' to 3.5' adapters with a hot-swappable tray inside.
    I was looking at these and was very surprised at how inexpensive they are:
    http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.19704

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    no problem. let me know how ur build turns out.

  • Nick

    Hi Frank,

    What is the process for swapping out one HDD for a larger one?

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    the process is almost exactly like the drobo.
    If the drive is not dead, you first issue a “scrub” command in ZFS to allow it to check the integrity of the data on the ZFS pool. just a precaution to make sure everything is intact as it should be.

    Then should down the computer, swap out the drive you want to replace with a larger drive.
    Go back into FreeNAS and issue the ZFS replace command to instruct the system that you are replacing a member of the ZFS with a larger drive.
    The system will again check for data integrity and start copying redundancy data onto the new drive.

  • Guest

    FYI: I’m using OpenSolaris with ZFS and I’m able to add additional drives to my ZFS pool. You can’t ever remove a drive from a pool (well, you can replace it), but its easy to add one.

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    I can be wrong. but the implementation of ZFS on Solaris and FreeBSD (what FreeNAS runs on) are two completely different beasts. The FreeBSD version will always be a bit behind Solaris.

    Again, I’m not completely certain about this as I do not have any more room in the NAS to actually add more drives in. However, from my research so far it is not possible to just add a new device into an existing ZFS pool on FreeNAS.

  • forkless

    Awesome write up. I’ve been looking at the Drobo stuff and wondering if I could build something similar and this is by far the best comparison I’ve come across.

    The ability to add drives is still making me lean towards Drobo, but at least I’ve got a good idea of what the alternatives are.
    Many thanks. :)

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    thanx forkless. glad to know u find it useful.

    I’m sure ZFS and FreeNAS will catch up soon to the drobo. I think how the drobo software works is that they prefill the system with virtual drives, so once a drive is inserted it takes over the virtual device. thus allowing u to add drives. and there are only a fixed amount of drive bays, so this method works.

    At the end it’s about keeping our data safe. I still like the ZFS approach a lot better. it’s open source, super stable. vs. the Drobo’s proprietary system that nobody else uses. if your drive is in trouble, you can save it. when the drobo is in trouble… you need to buy another one just to recover the data.

  • http://www.laptopbatteriesinc.com.au laptop battery

    Go back into FreeNAS and issue the ZFS replace command to instruct the system that you are replacing a member of the ZFS with a larger drive.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=544922121 Oded Shopen

    Very interesting article.

    I do have to consider however, what is the advantage of this setup (other than being open source and cool to do for a geek like me) compared to the Netgear ReadyNAS NV+? It is priced at 299$ and I get all the benefits of this setup, plus the ability to add drives and I go along.

    http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-ReadyNAS-4-Bay-0TB-Diskless/dp/B000VA3TXY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1283791348&sr=8-1

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    btw. all this can be done in FreeNAS’ webGUI. you don’t have to SSH and issue the commands manually. you can if you want to. =p

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    sorry I didn’t see your question until now.
    The ReadyNAS series from Netgear is a pretty descent lineup. I actually considered some of them before I went with the DIY.

    Basically, these machines from Netgear are traditional RAID 0/1/5 setups, which of course carries all the flaws of RAID. See Raid 5 write-hole for ex. http://davidfrancis.blogspot.com/2008/07/raid-5-write-hole.html

    Secondly, just like most consumer grade devices. Manufacturers cut cost by putting in mediocre hardware. I believe this ReadyNAS box runs a Netgear IT3107 storage processor and only 256MB of memory. 256MB is barely enough to run a Linux kernel and it will NOT be able to cache your file transfers at all.

    If you mainly store files up to 100mb, you might get away with 256MB of RAM. However, once you hit files bigger than that or have multiple users access the NAS; the cache will be exhausted very quickly and it will slow down to a crawl. Netgear will of course not tell people that.

    for $250 (and possibly lower now) you can put together a device that is several times more powerful than the ReadyNAS box.

    hope that answers your questions.

  • Shailesh J Kumar

    Hi Frank,
    This is a gr8 post and I am going to build one for myself. Just few questions.
    1) Instead of 2 GiB RAM, if I get 4GiB on it, would the speed be better than what mentioned?
    2) Will the http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136514 work on it? I am planning to get 4 of them. Its on the new 4KB technology as far as I rememeber.
    Let me know.
    Shailesh

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    Hi Shailesh, I’m glad you found the post to be useful.1. the more RAM won’t necessarily give you faster performance as the transfer speed is depended on your chipset I/O, network adapter and even the router. what it will give you is sustained high performance for transferring large files. ZFS uses a lot of cache to make sure the I/O is always working at maximum speed. However, 2GB of RAM will run out rather quickly if you are trying to transfer a 4GB+ file. That’s when more RAM will help. For 4GB of RAM you should have no problem transferring a 10GB file across at maximum throughput.I do have to tell you that the NM10 Chipset used for Intel Atom cannot give you speeds faster than 40MB/s. For more you will need to use a regular desktop grade chipset and motherboard – at the cost of using up more electricity of course. =p2. The WD 2TB Green drives are exactly what I’m running. They are super quiet, super smart when it comes to power management, and very reasonably priced.
    You should be able to find them for less than $139 USD tho. seehttp://www.amazon.com/Western-Digital-Intellipower-Desktop-WD20EARS/dp/B002ZCXK0IGood luck bud.

  • Matt

    Hi Frank,

    Great article! Two questions:

    1. I know almost nothing about computers but I did build my own screaming fast PC for photo editing. Is building and configuring a functioning, stable NAS as easy as it seems from your article?

    2. What happens to the data on the drive array if there is a mobo or processor failure? Can the drives be placed into another machine with FreeNAS and the data be retrieved?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=544922121 Oded Shopen

    Thanks, Frank.
    I actually already went ahead and bought my hardware. I chose the Antec 1380 case (just love how small it is, plus when I need to add more drives I’ll just use this case for an HTPC).
    I also chose the Gigabyte GA-D510UD, it actually has 4 SATA ports so I still have a spare PCI card for future expansion to more drives. I added 2 sticks 2GB RAM for a total of 4GB, and 8TB of drives. I’m trying the NexentraStor route, it seems like they sorted out the issues with USB boot (I Hope).
    Will update you on the progress (still waiting for the drives to arrive).

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    Very nice find on that gigabyte board! 4 Sata and IDE. That will solve a lot of headaches I mentioned in the post.
    How much did it cost u?
    please keep us posted on the nexenta install.
    Hope they resolved all of the problems with regard to USB install.

  • http://mim.outrora.eu/ Miguel Marques

    Hi,

    I’m thinking of getting a system inspired in your post (yup, I’m tired of having 3+ USB disks hooked you to my mac and share it’s files around the house). But I have a question:

    You went out to get a PCI SATA card. the MB you got has got a PCI-E slot, why did you go for a PCI (slower) card?

    Cheers,
    Miguel

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    Hi, thank you for dropping by.

    The D510MO has a mini PCI-E slot. however I could not find any SATA adapter in that form factor.
    So had to use a PCI card. If u can find a Mini PCI-E SATA card then feel free to use that instead. :)

  • H3ctor

    hello frank , i enjoy reading your guide again and again :)
    is it possible to run it virtually ?

  • http://www.pcbestregistrycleaner.com/ best registry cleaner
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=544922121 Oded Shopen

    Hi Frank,
    In the end, the gigabyte model was out of stock. I eventually found the following model which is similar: Asus AT3N7A-I. It has 3 internal sata ports and 1 external e-sata port. I just got an e-sata to sata cable and that was it. The board cost me the equivalent of 140$.

    For the case, I bought the Enermax Laguna. It is much smaller that the NSK 2480 but still very easy to work with. I paid 90$ for it. Please note that these are prices in Israel, it should be much cheaper in the U.S.

    I decided to do something weird: I installed UBUNTU 10.10 on this machine, and I am running FreeNAS from a virtual machine (Oracle VirtualBox). VirtualBox has a nice feature of allowing you direct, physical access to a physical hard drive. In this case the “Virtual Hard Drive” simply points you to the actual drive. It actually works really great.
    I did this because the board I bought has the NVidia ION chipset on it, so I thought I’d just use it as the Media Center as well. This config allows me to run a 1080p movie in XBMC, fully GPU decoded so CPU stays low. The movie can run off the FreeNAS virtual machine. Because it is the same machine – I get consistent throughput. Obviously, freenas manages the ZFS raidz pool.

    The main problem I am having now is speed. This is not related to Virtual Machine – I see that Freenas uses very little memory and very little CPU cycles. I get around 1.8 megabytes of file transfer out of it. I am pretty sure that the WD green drives are to blame. It is a shame I bought these, since they have the “Advanced Format Drive” implementation of 4096 sector size, instead of the standard 512bytes. ZFS doesn’t play with it quite well yet, it degrades the speed very fast and might even screw up your RAID configuration in the end. See info here:
    http://freenas.org/faq:0139
    https://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/freenas/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=5843

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=544922121 Oded Shopen

    Well, it all ended up quite well.

    FreeNAS just released a new version that supports 4k drives like the WD20EARS in a ZFS pool (they use gnop as a workaround). It works well.

    Once I had the full hard drive speed at hand, the bottleneck became my CPU. So I reverted back to the box just being a NAS and nothing else. It is fast, reliable and fun to use. Time Machine backups work dead-easy, and I even get a UPNP server with transcoding for my PS3.

    Thanks for the great blog post, you’re the one who got me into this adventure and it turned out excellent! :)

  • Jon

    Hi Frank,

    I’m in the process of buying everything I need for a NAS, what is the best atom motherboard and processor to achieve higher than 40-60mbs a second.

    The NAS will be storing all my blue ray films to stream/backup.

    Thanks
    Jon

  • durd

    Aaahahaha, this is madness!
    I peaked 820Mb/s with a 8.5GB file over FTP. Sure, its udp packets, but still, coming quite close to having the network as a bottleneck is freakishly exciting :D
    4xWD20EARS in a zfs raid10 (2 mirrors, one pool), no atime of course. Also the motherboard is a Zotac ION ITX G-E, Intel Atom N330.

    An hour later im still grinning about the speed :D
    SMB/CIFS:
    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2929757/Screenshots/nas2desk_smbcifs_2.png

  • Todd

    So just to be clear, 246$ was the total cost for the CPU, Motherboard, Case, and accessories. That price excludes the cost of the four 2 TB drives, right?

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    Yep you are right! the latest 7.2 build 5462 has the 4k drive fix. I have been running a nightly build of 7.2 and did not experience significant problem with the 4k greens.However, I think for those of us that already have data on the ZFS pools… we might have to reformat the pool to make it 4k compatible. I could be wrong tho…

    Oded, glad this could be useful to you! Good luck and thanx for commenting!

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    if speed is your main concern, then I would actually got for a low end Celeron system or AMD Sempron system. The Atom is fast enough, but the chipset that Intel uses – NM10 is NOT.
    NM10 will become your biggest bottleneck when transferring super large files. However, there are users who reported back with breakneck speeds on atoms. Look at the post above you. =) The trick there was he picked a motherboard with a Nvidia ION chipset instead of the Intel NM10.

    The NM10 is must more energy efficient than any other chip, but it wasn’t designed for super speedy data transfers.

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    WOW! awesome speed! I didn’t know the nVidia ION chipest could make that much of a difference! very impressive! You certainly cannot get those speeds with the Intel NM10 chipset.

    Congrats! and gosh I’m jealous. haha
    tho I think FTP is on TCP, and TFTP is udp packets. Were you transferring over TFTP?

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    That is correct. the 4 2TB drives will likely run another $300 ish. They are sold for slight less than $100 nowadays. If you are lucky to catch a sale somewhere, I have seen them going for $70 USD each.

    and the $246 (Canadian Dollars) quote was when I built my system which is almost 6 months ago. I’m pretty sure you can get them for much less now. possibly even under $200

  • Todd

    Thanks Frank. I’m looking at the Gigabyte GA-D525TUD as an alternative motherboard mainly because it has four onboard SATA ports.

    http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3549#ov

    It’s $10 more (US) than the Intel D510MO but that’s less than the cost of a PCI SATA Controller and I would assume one would be able to achieve a bit better throughput with the onboard SATA vs. the PCI card. One thing I like about the Intel over the Gigabyte board is that the Intel board uses passive cooling. I’m sure there are passive heat syncs that could be installed if the noise from the CPU fan was really that bad.

    Using the Antec NSK2480 case, I assume you used some 5.25/3.5 inch drive adapters to install two of your four drives into the external 5.25 inch drive bays. Is that correct?

    I would be interested to learn what your power consumption is like with your build. Do you happen to have any way to test the voltage draw?

  • http://www.frankleng.me Frank Leng

    Hey Todd, awesome find! If it’s only a $10 difference personally I would go for the Gigabyte any day. You are right that onboard SATA ports will be much faster, at least theoretically.

    I did have to use 2 5.25′ to 3.5′ brackets in order to mount the drives, but they were $2 a piece and very easy to install. It’s not ideal, but the case was inexpensive and got the best arrangement of internal space and cooling.

    I’ll bring my UPS up sometimes to test the power draw. It has a meter built-in to test for V and Watts.
    My guess is that idling will be less than 20W. full load will likely be 40-60W.

    I’ll keep you updated.

  • Todd

    From my quick research it looks like RAIDZ with three or four drives will give you about the same amount of storage space as a RAID5 with the same number of drives. Is that correct? It looks like RAIDZ with three or four drives is single parity. I assume if I created one zpool with four 1TB drives I would end up with about 3TB of storage capacity. Is that right?

    Another question, if I only had two large drives for example but wanted to be able to expand to four drives I should for example, install two 1TB and two 80GB drives with the plan to replace those 80GB drives with larger drives down the road.

See also: